Zodiac on the Gravity platform vs Airdrop vs QuickShare single-file transmission comparison

In this video, we’re demonstrating the difference between Gravity’s file-sharing engine Zodiac and it’s mainstream competitors by comparing how they send a single photo to five different devices. A Gravity-enabled Google Pixel 3a is used against an iPhone with AirDrop and a Samsung Galaxy with QuickShare—all three devices are updated with the latest OS available. 

We learned that the Gravity-enabled phone performs complex file sharing assignments much more efficiently than both AirDrop and QuickShare—especially when sending to multiple devices at the same time. Transferring files is multi-directional with Zodiac, so sharing isn’t limited to one host device initiating with another device. Every Gravity-enabled device can swap files in an unlimited amount of configurations—whether it’s one-to-one, one-to-many, many-to-one, or many-to many. 

Gravity offers faster and more stable data transfer of data between devices too since it creates it’s very own Wi-Fi Direct mesh network—whereas AirDrop relies on a combination of Bluetooth and Bonjour while Samsung utilizes Bluetooth and Wi-Fi Direct, which ends up slowing down transfer speeds. It also ensures that Gravity successfully sends files to all devices at the same time instead of sending them sequentially. 

Click here to learn more about Gravity and Zodiac